Some answers to the questions about the cancer associated
anorexia-cachexia syndrome include the following:
1. What is the anorexia-cachexia syndrome?
The syndrome is characterized by host tissue wasting, anorexia,
skeletal muscle atrophy, accelerated fat loss, anergy, and visceral organ
atrophy. These are often found before signs and symptoms of the tumor itself
are manifested. It is not a local effect of the tumor but rather arises from
a distant metabolic effect and is felt to be a paraneoplastic syndrome. It
resolves with effective antitumor therapy but will continue if therapy is
ineffective or not initiated. It is the most common cause of death in cancer
patients, usually through respiratory depression secondary to wasting of the
respiratory muscles or to infection.
2. What is its pathophysiology?
Older theories suggested competition for nutrients between
the tumor and the host. This however seems unlikely because some cancer patients
with very large tumors show no signs of wasting, while some patients (like
ours) with severe wasting have tumors representing less than 0.01% of their
total body weight. Weight loss can arise from a decreased energy intake and
absorption or increased energy expenditure, or a combination of both. Most
studies have shown both hypercatabolism and decreased energy intake. Rouzer
and Cerami identified "cachectin" to be the agent responsible for
increased fat metabolism and weight loss in chronically infected rabbits.
Cachetin was later found to be identical to tumor necrosis factor in humans.
It is one of the major mediators of the wasting syndromes in cancer patients,
together with interferon gamma, interleukin 6, and other cytokines. These
factors mediate wasting by inhibition of lipoprotein lipase, preventing adipocytes
from extracting fatty acids from plasma lipoproteins and by stimulating triglyceride
hydrolysis in the adipocytes through the acivation of triglyceride lipase.
Tumor necrosis factor has been shown to mediate muscle wasting by the activation
of protein mobilizing factor in the skeletal muscle. An interesting development
is the discovery of several muscle-specific ubiquitin ligases. These enzymes
are situated in a pathway of proteolysis common to a variety of wasting states.
They may prove to be a valuable point of intervention in muscle atrophy.
Of course, weight loss may be due to mechanical factors (for
example, gastric outlet obstruction) or physiologic factors (for example,
decreased fat asorption due to low levels of intestinal bile salts or pancretic
enzymes). These should be addressed as in the non-cancer patient.
3. What is the role of nutritional therapy in the management
of cancer patients with the anorexia-cachexia syndrome?
a. Is there a benefit to nutritional support in the cancer
patient who will have surgery? The Veterans Affairs Total Parenteral Nutrition
Cooperative Study Group studied 395 patients who underwent elective laparotomy
or noncardiac thoracotomy. These patients were randomly assigned to receive
parenteral nutrition versus a regular diet for one to two weeks prior to surgery.
Patients with mild malnutrition did not benefit from parenteral nutrition.
Patients with severe malnutrition who received parenteral nutrition had a
lower incidence of complications related to healing. Muller et al. showed
fewer complications in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer who received
preoperative parenteral nutrition.
b. Does nutritional support (apart from preoperative support)
affect the survival of cancer patients? Klein et al. showed that patients
undergoing chemotherapy who are given parenteral nutrition have higher rates
of pneumonia and sepsis. No benefit in survival, treatment tolerance, side
effects of antineoplasic therapy, or response to treatment has been shown
in cancer patients receiving nutritional support.
Nutritional support in cancer patients should be restricted
to those with a prolonged life expectancy but who are unable to maintain adequate
intake on their own for a long period of time. This may result in an improved
quality of life.
c. A few clinical trials showed increased caloric and protein
intake but resulted in no improvement in nutritional status, weight, tumor
response, survival, or quality of life.
4. What pharmacologic interventions are available for the
treatment of the cancer related anorexia-cachexia syndrome?
Resting energy expenditures are elevated, and increased intermediary
metabolism, proteolysis, and lipolysis occur independently of caloric intake.
An interaction between catecholamines, prostaglandins, and inflammatory cytokines
seems to be responsible for cachexia. Thus, pharmacologic tretment should
increase appetite and decrease metabolism. The first agents used in the management
of anorexic cancer patients were corticosteroids such as dexamethasone, methylprednisolone,
and prednisolone. These agents stimulate the appetite. The mechanism of action
is unclear but may be due to their euphorigenic effects. The duration of appetite
stimulation, however, is short and frequently requires increasing doses over
time. Patients experience the usual adverse effects associated with chronic
steroid use. Medroxyprogesterone and megestrol acetate have also been evaluated.
Their mechanism of action may be related to their anabolic effects as well
as to appetite stimulation. Most patients experience increased appetite but
only a small percent increase as much as 10% of their weight. Their use is
not associated with improvements in body composition as measured by anthropometrics.
In one study dronabinol was less effective than megestrol acetate. In view
of the role that cytokines have in the pathogenesis of cancer wasting, several
anticytokine modalities have been tried. Pentoxyfylline has been shown to
be inhibit TNF production in lymphocytes and its use has been associated with
reduced TNF levels in cancer patients. These patients reported weight gain
and an increase in well being. Whether its use is associated with improved
outcome has yet to be studied. Thalidomide has also been shown to inhibit
TNF production. It has been associated with significant weight gain in AIDS
patients. Studies in cancer patients are inconclusive. Those drugs under study
include antiserotonergic drugs, gastroprokinetic agents, branched-chain amino
acids, eicosapentanoic acid, cannabinoids, and melatonin--all of which act
on the feeding-regulatory circuitry to increase appetite and inhibit tumor-derived
catabolic factors to antagonize tissue wasting and/or host cytokine release.