Findings
Houston, Texas
Volume 6, Issue 4
April 2008

Addicts not 'wired' to stop even though they know of dangers

By Ruth SoRelle, M.P.H.

P. Read Montague, Ph.D.
P. Read Montague, Ph.D.

Knowing about potential risks is not enough to get addicted people to stop their behavior.

Using a simple stock market game, researchers from Baylor College of Medicine showed that the brains of chronic smokers recognize "what might happen," or fictive outcomes, but do not act on that brain signal. The report appeared in the journal Nature Neuroscience.

In most people, "fictive" outcomes play a "dominant role in the choices we make," said P. Read Montague, Ph.D., professor of neuroscience and director of the Computational Psychiatry Unit at BCM. "The brain computes signals that evaluate unexperienced possibilities, both positive and negative, and then guide us into our actions. It's these fictive guidance signals that keep us from becoming purely reward-harvesting machines in the way that addicts are."

Testing outcomes

The researchers used an investment game and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test the precise effects of these "what if" outcomes on decisions and brain activity in smokers and non-smokers.

Terry Lohrenz, Ph.D.
Terry Lohrenz, Ph.D.

When subjects play the investment game, they invest money in a stock market, and then are shown how much the investment made and the maximum amount they could have made. The researchers found that for nonsmokers, the most important influence on the next investment was "what could have happened" on the last round. However, even though smokers' brains recognized what could have happened in the previous round (as shown in the fMRI results), their next actions were based primarily on the actual rewards they received.

"The brain's might-have-been signal in smokers is identical to nonsmokers, but the smokers don't act on it," said Terry Lohrenz of BCM's Computational Psychiatry Unit and one of the report's authors. "We think that in smokers, the parts of the brain that react to these fictive signals may be impaired. There's an imbalance between acting on immediate rewards and acting on fictive outcomes, and the smokers are led almost completely by the immediate actual rewards."

Forgoing good health

The authors' findings fit with the fact that addicts – including smokers – continue drug use and pursue addictive behaviors even though they know that it may have devastating effects and that they are forgoing good health.

Pearl Chiu, Ph.D.
Pearl Chiu, Ph.D.

"Using this game, we can quantitatively measure a person's response to fictive outcomes, and we think the findings have significant implications for understanding and treating addiction," said Pearl Chiu, Ph.D., first author on the paper and assistant professor in BCM's Computational Psychiatry Unit. "Improving the recognition of 'what might happen' could be a focus of cognitive behavioral therapies, and neurofeedback might target brain systems that strengthen the impact of fictive outcomes on addicts' behavior."

The researchers wrote in their paper that "these findings are consonant with the emerging understanding of addiction at the molecular level, and the computational model-based approach implemented here facilitates a mechanistic understanding of continued drug use in the presence of potential negative consequences and foregone positive outcomes."

Funding for this research came from the Kane Family Foundation, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the Angel Williamson Imaging Center, and the American Psychological Association.

The report is available at www.nature.com/natureneuroscience.